I join the question above and ask too. When you plan to introduce ufs support? At the moment, this is the most relevant and demanded memory standard.作者: admin 时间: 2021-12-1 16:30
I understand that it's hard to do right away, but although you can make it clear to wait for ufs support at all or buy another programmer.作者: STALKER_71 时间: 2021-12-1 16:34
I understand that it's hard to do right away, but although you can make it clear to wait for ufs support at all or buy another programmer.作者: admin 时间: 2021-12-1 16:51
There is no need to wait for t56 to support UFS.
I can not determine whether it can be supported. The differential signal of t56 FPGA can reach up to 960MHZ, but UFS requires 1.2GHZ. I wonder if UFS can work at low frequencies.作者: q519948746 时间: 2021-12-1 21:42
Thanks,I have these documents。作者: STALKER_71 时间: 2021-12-5 07:55
Maybe PWM-mode as in z3x can be supported. It used one differential line. And work in low speed.作者: admin 时间: 2021-12-5 08:35
回复 11#STALKER_71
PWM MODE speed is too low . only support G4. MAX 72MHZ
A UFS device shall support the PWM‐G1 (default, mandated by [M‐PHY]), PWM‐G2, PWM‐G3 and PWM‐G4 GEARS. The PWM‐G5, PWM‐G6 and PWM‐G7 are optional.
A plan has been found. It can support HS-G1 on T56 (not tested yet), but due to the global lack of chips, it is now necessary to complete an additional task with a workload of 5 months, so it only be tested later.作者: STALKER_71 时间: 2021-12-5 19:00
OK. We just have to wait.作者: bg4lbi 时间: 2022-2-14 22:27
Messages were deleted, of course. Thereby recognizing that they simply scored on ufs and that's it. No one flash ufs dumps of 10GB. For the configuration and firmware of bootloaders, 3MB / s is enough. But like I said earlier, you don't want to do that. Delete messages as much as you like. It won't help you. Look for other fools and tell them stories. How about jtag support? We need to wait some more years?作者: Albano.Matos 时间: 2022-2-17 16:46
Messages were deleted, of course. Thereby recognizing that they simply scored on ufs and that's it. ...
STALKER_71 发表于 2022-2-17 16:22
As an User... Just an idea. What about a developer kit for T56, for anyone could build it's own future needs?Even if need to pay extra, or maybe it's already there for anyone with such skills.
Hope it's a nice and fair idea , or not....:)作者: admin 时间: 2022-2-18 08:42
Can You find a universal programmer that supports UFS that the price is low than 500USD?
Can not someone develop a universal programmer with UFS ?(It's all because of hardware limitations, it can't be done,UFS must use a separate high-speed interface)
if support it with lower speed. it will be complained by more peoples. Also I think this is a garbage function.
It is already very good to do so about T56 with a low price.
The function of the programmer is relative.T56 can support it very well, other programmers do not support it, and there are also many cases.
JTAG generally used on 8/16/32-bit microcontrollers. it has been tested via JTAG for PIC32.
JTAG programming for MCU cannot be added in the short term.